How did federalists address fears about the Constitution?

How did federalists address fears about the Constitution?

The Federalists countered that a strong government was necessary to lead the new nation and promised to add a bill of rights to the Constitution. The Federalist Papers, in particular, argued in favor of ratification and sought to convince people that the new government would not become tyrannical.

What did the Federalists fear about the government?

They feared that a strong central government would overpower state governments, and eventually state governments would lose their independence and influence. They also didn’t like that the original Constitution did not guarantee citizens any specific rights.

What did anti-federalists fear the most?

The Anti-Federalists opposed the ratification of the 1787 U.S. Constitution because they feared that the new national government would be too powerful and thus threaten individual liberties, given the absence of a bill of rights.

What type of tyranny did the Federalists fear the most?

The Federalists feared the tyranny of the mob the most.

What would federalists most likely respond to this?

How would Federalists most likely respond to this? They would agree and be confident that the Constitution meets those goals.

How did the Federalists feel about ratifying the Constitution?

The Federalists wanted to ratify the Constitution, the Anti-Federalists did not. The Federalists felt that this addition wasn’t necessary, because they believed that the Constitution as it stood only limited the government not the people.

Why did the Federalists win approval of the constitution?

The Federalists wanted a strong government and strong executive branch, while the anti-Federalists wanted a weaker central government. The Federalists did not want a bill of rights —they thought the new constitution was sufficient.

Which complaint was the greatest barrier to ratifying the Constitution?

The Bill of Rights

What arguments both for and against a bill of rights might the two groups have developed?

What arguments both for and against a Bill of Rights might the two groups have developed? The Federalists would probably say that they felt checks and balances along with the separation of powers would protect the rights of individuals more effectively than a bill of rights.

Why did the Bill of Rights not strongly affect citizens lives until after 1920s?

The Bill of Rights did not strongly affect most citizens’ lives because it only limited the actions of the federal government and did not apply to the states until after the Fourteenth Amendment was ratified in 1868.

What is the impact of the Bill of Rights?

What Is the Impact of the Bill of Rights? The Bill of Rights limited only actions taken by the federal government against people. The Founders assumed citizens would be protected against state governments by their home states’ constitutions.

Does the Bill of Rights grant rights?

Except for a few procedural rights specifically for the trial process, the Bill of Rights does not actually bestow rights. Many framers considered a Bill of Rights unnecessary. They argued that the nature of the Constitution rendered it redundant. The Constitution itself only grants the government specified powers.

Begin typing your search term above and press enter to search. Press ESC to cancel.

Back To Top