How did the 3/5ths compromise resolve the differences delegates had over slavery?

How did the 3/5ths compromise resolve the differences delegates had over slavery?

The Great Compromise settled matters of representation in the federal government. The Three-Fifths Compromise settled matters of representation when it came to the enslaved population of southern states and the importation of enslaved Africans. The Electoral College settled how the president would be elected.

How do you feel about the three-fifths compromise was it a wise decision by the framers of the Constitution to keep the nation united?

Answer: I feel that the Three-Fifths Compromise was an unacceptable compromise even at the cost of the nation breaking up over the issue of slavery. Explanation: It constituted a clear injustice, since the slaves were mistreated and used as merchandise, but at the same time, required for political purposes.

How did the 3/5 compromise affect the civil war?

Under the compromise, every enslaved American would be counted as three-fifths of a person for taxation and representation purposes. This agreement gave the Southern states more electoral power than they would have had if the enslaved population had been ignored entirely.

How did the three-fifths compromise work quizlet?

It said that slaves could be counted as 3/5 of a person for both representation and taxation. Also said that international slave trade would not cease (stop) for two decades (until 1808). The federal government was to assist in the return of runaway slaves (“fugitive laborers”) throughout the country.

What was the primary purpose of the 3/5 compromise?

The primary purpose of the 3/5 Compromise was to increase representation within the states by including slaves into the states population. Slaves were counted as 3/5 of a person.

What was the direct outcome of the 3/5 compromise?

Three-fifths compromise, compromise agreement between delegates from the Northern and the Southern states at the United States Constitutional Convention (1787) that three-fifths of the slave population would be counted for determining direct taxation and representation in the House of Representatives.

What was the 3/5ths compromise and why is it a problem?

What was the problem with the 3/5 compromise?

Compromise and enactment A contentious issue at the 1787 Constitutional Convention was whether slaves would be counted as part of the population in determining representation of the states in the Congress or would instead be considered property and, as such, not be considered for purposes of representation.

Which of the following best describes the impact of the three-fifths compromise?

The correct answer is C. Under the Three-Fifths Compromise, slaves would be counted as three-fifths of a person when determining representation in Congress.

Which of these best describes the Great Compromise?

The Great Compromise saved the Constitutional Convention, and, probably, the Union. Authored by Connecticut delegate Roger Sherman, it called for proportional representation in the House, and one representative per state in the Senate (this was later changed to two.)

What best explains the need for the great compromise?

It gave states the power to determine their own populations. It determined how states would be represented in Congress. It became a way for northern states to gain more representation. It determined that states would have equal representation in the Senate.

Begin typing your search term above and press enter to search. Press ESC to cancel.

Back To Top