What did the Boston Tea Party result in?
|Boston Tea Party|
|Goals||To protest British Parliament’s tax on tea. “No taxation without representation.”|
|Methods||Throw the tea into Boston Harbor|
|Resulted in||Intolerable Acts|
|Parties to the civil conflict|
What happened in the Boston Tea Party and how did Great Britain respond?
The British response to the Boston Tea Party was to impose even more stringent policies on the Massachusetts colony. The Coercive Acts levied fines for the destroyed tea, sent British troops to Boston, and rewrote the colonial charter of Massachusetts, giving broadly expanded powers to the royally appointed governor.
What three actions did the British take to punish the colonists after the Boston Tea Party?
The four acts were (1) the Boston Port Bill, which closed Boston Harbor; (2) the Massachusetts Government Act, which replaced the elective local government with an appointive one and increased the powers of the military governor; (3) the Administration of Justice Act, which allowed British officials charged with …
When did the Tea Party movement start?
Do prisoners prefer death penalty?
Most Americans now favor life in prison over the death penalty for convicted murderers. By comparison, 36 percent of people selected the death penalty. Another 4 percent said they had no opinion. Most states have the death penalty.
Why is the death penalty wrong?
The fact that it doesn’t prevent crime may be the most significant reason why the death penalty is wrong. In states without the death penalty, the murder rate is much lower. There are other factors at play, but the fact remains that no studies show that capital punishment is a deterrent.
Is the death sentence good?
A: No, there is no credible evidence that the death penalty deters crime more effectively than long terms of imprisonment. States that have death penalty laws do not have lower crime rates or murder rates than states without such laws. The death penalty has no deterrent effect.
Is Death Penalty good in the Bible?
The Bible speaks in favour of the death penalty for murder. But it also prescribes it for 35 other crimes that we no longer regard as deserving the death penalty. In order to be consistent, humanity should remove the death penalty for murder.