What is true regarding an acknowledgments section?

What is true regarding an acknowledgments section?

Which of the following is true regarding an acknowledgments section? Individuals who do not meet the criteria for authorship but who have made a noteworthy contribution are normally listed in the acknowledgments section.

Which author is normally responsible for sharing reprints?

Comment : The corresponding author is normally responsible for sharing reprints of a publication with readers.

Which of the following is true regarding data acquisition?

Which of the following is true regarding data acquisition? Data acquisition should follow a detailed collection plan that is set in advance. In the research context, the term validity most commonly refers to: Researchers who receive federal funding may have to adhere to a data sharing requirement.

Which of the following is true regarding academic industry collaborations?

The correct answer is 4) The industry sponsor typically owns the data from research that it funds. The statement that is true regarding academic-industry collaborations is “The industry sponsor typically owns the data from research that it funds.”

What is the most appropriate course of action for a trainee who has a problem with a mentor?

What is the most appropriate course of action for a trainee who has a problem with a mentor? After trying to communicate directly with the mentor, the trainee should seek advice from a senior person that the trainee trusts.

Which of the following is most likely to help the journal publication process mitigate reproducibility problems?

Which of the following is most likely to help the journal publication process mitigate reproducibility problems? Moving away from a review process that favors the publication of positive results.

How can you make sure data is reproducible?

make your lab research more reproducible

  1. Automate data analysis.
  2. After automating data analysis, publish all code (public access)
  3. Publish all data (public access)
  4. Standardize and document experimental protocols.
  5. Track samples and reagents.
  6. Disclose negative or convoluted results.
  7. Increase transparency of data and statistics.

How do you ensure a study is replicable?

What do I do to make my results replicable?

  1. Drilling down to a specific question of interest with a corresponding, measurable quantity.
  2. Collecting a representative sample of the population of interest by randomizing appropriately.
  3. Identification of the appropriate statistical model for your data and experimental design.

Which of the following is true regarding authors who seek to publish the same content?

Your answer : Authors are never allowed to publish the same content multiple times. Correct Answer : Using the same content in multiple papers is deceptive if it is not properly disclosed to journal editors or other relevant entities.

Which of the following is the most appropriate step to take if authors believe?

Which of the following is the most appropriate step to take if authors believe that their manuscript was reviewed unfairly? The author can contact the editor with their concerns.

When authors summarize the work of others they typically should?

When authors summarize the work of others, they typically should: Provide a condensed (shorter) version of the original material.

Which of the following most accurately describes the reproducibility crisis?

Which of the following most accurately describes the “reproducibility crisis?” It is a problem that can potentially affect any research field.

What are the two main contributing factors to the reproducibility crisis?

Nosek and his co-authors attribute the reproducibility problem, in part, to a combination of publication bias and low-power research designs. Publications favor flashy, positive results, making it more likely that studies with larger-than-life effect sizes are chosen for publication.

Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis?

To summarize, an expanding metaresearch literature suggests that science—while undoubtedly facing old and new challenges—cannot be said to be undergoing a “reproducibility crisis,” at least not in the sense that it is no longer reliable due to a pervasive and growing problem with findings that are fabricated, falsified …

What are some of the reasons a study may fail to replicate?

In many cases, non-replicated research is caused by differences in the participants or in other extraneous variables that might influence the results of an experiment.

What are at least three reasons that a replication attempt might fail?

  • Original operationalizations were not relevant in replication study.
  • Original sample size was small.
  • Questionable research practices.
  • Scientific journals want original studyies not replications.
  • Publication Bias – significant differences over null effects.

What is the main problem with replication in psychology?

The “replication crisis” in psychology, as it is often called, started around 2010, when a paper using completely accepted experimental methods was published purporting to find evidence that people were capable of perceiving the future, which is impossible.

Why is the replication crisis happening?

Causes. A major cause of low reproducibility is the publication bias and the selection bias, in turn caused by the fact that statistically insignificant results are rarely published or discussed in publications on multiple potential effects.

How can Replication crisis be prevented?

Key points to keep in mind to avoid replication crisis would be:

  1. Even though it is expensive, we should perform replication often.
  2. We should publish more NULL results, that does not support hypothesis so that p hacking can be avoided.

What are the two types of replication?

Blomquist. There are two types of replication Blomquist1986: literal and construct. In a literal replication, the researcher uses the same measures with the same type of subjects, and controls the same conditions.

When did the replication crisis start?

The term, which originated in the early 2010s, denotes that findings in behavioral science often cannot be replicated: Researchers do not obtain results comparable to the original, peer-reviewed study when repeating that study using similar procedures.

What is the difference between an exact replication and a conceptual replication?

There are different types of replication. Exact replications tell us whether the original findings are true, at least under the exact conditions tested. Conceptual replications help confirm whether the theoretical idea behind the findings is true, and under what conditions these findings will occur.

Why is replication important?

Replication is an essential process because, whenever a cell divides, the two new daughter cells must contain the same genetic information, or DNA, as the parent cell. The replication process relies on the fact that each strand of DNA can serve as a template for duplication.

Begin typing your search term above and press enter to search. Press ESC to cancel.

Back To Top