What was the result of the Indian Rebellion of 1857?

What was the result of the Indian Rebellion of 1857?

Indian Rebellion of 1857

Date 10 May 1857 – 1 November 1858 (1 year and 6 months)
Location India
Result British victory Suppression of revolt Formal end of the Mughal Empire End of Company rule in India Transfer of rule to the British Crown

What caused the Indian Mutiny of 1857?

The immediate cause of the Indian Revolt of 1857, or Sepoy Mutiny, was a seemingly minor change in the weapons used by the British East India Company’s troops. In order to open the cartridges and load the rifles, soldiers (known as sepoys) had to bite into the paper and tear it with their teeth.

What were the main events of the Indian Mutiny?

Decisive events of the Indian Mutiny

  • Hodson’s Horse at Rhotuck, 1857.
  • Repulse of a rebel sortie on the Delhi Ridge, 1857.
  • The ruins of General Wheeler’s entrenchment at Cawnpore, 1858.
  • Surgeons Anthony Dickson Home and William Bradshaw winning the VC with Havelock’s relief column, 26 September 1857.
  • Mayne’s Horse attacking mutineers in Gwalior, 1858.

What was the main reason behind the Sepoy Rebellion of 1857 quizlet?

the causes of the sepoy rebellion was when some angry sepoys rose up against their british officers. Also when the east india company required sepoys to serve overseas which was against the sepoy’s religion. Some effects of the rebellion was a bitter legacy and a mistrust on both sides.

What happened as a result of the Sepoy Mutiny?

The immediate result of the mutiny was a general housecleaning of the Indian administration. The East India Company was abolished in favour of the direct rule of India by the British government. Another significant result of the mutiny was the beginning of the policy of consultation with Indians. …

How has British rule affected India quizlet?

How did British colonial rule affect Indian agriculture? British encouraged Indian farmers to grow cash crops which led to massive deforestation and famines. British did not like Indian culture and felt that western educated Indians would support British rule. Indians dreamed of ending British control.

Which of the following was a benefit of British rule in India quizlet?

What were the benefits of the British rule for the Indians? It brought order and stability to the Indian society which had been badly divided by civil war. It also led to a honest & efficient government.

What were the positive and negative effects of British rule in India quizlet?

What were the positives and negative effects of British rule on Indians? Positive: Improved transport, Farming methods, order justice, and education. Negative: Exploitation, destruction of local industry, deforestation, and famine.

What was the impact of British rule on the Indian economy quizlet?

What effects did British rule have on India’s economy? The transformation of British India’s economy was also doubled edged . On one hand, the raj created many new jobs as a result of the growth of trade and expanded crop production, such as opium in Bengal, largely an export for China.

What was the impact of British rule on the Indian economy?

They forced the commercialisation of agriculture with the growing of various cash crops and the raw materials for the industries in the Britain. With the strong political control, the British were able to monopolise the trade with India. They defeated their foreign rivals in trade so that there could be no competition.

What were two positive effects of British rule in India quizlet?

Two POSITIVE effects of the British control on India: Because of Railroad Network, 1. telegraph lines, dams, and rivers modernized India.

What were some of the major consequences of British rule in India and how did they affect the Indian people?

Costs: only some Indians got access to education and others remained illiterate, taxes were increased, British manufactured goods destroyed local industries, British textiles put many women out of work, encouragement to switch from growing food to growing cotton led to starvation, best jobs and housing were taken by …

What were the positive and negative effects of British rule in India?

Positive: It brought some peace and order to the countryside. The British revised the legal system to promote justice for Indians regardless of class or caste. Railroads helped Indians move around the country. Negative: British people knew little about Indian achievements and dismissed Indian culture with contempt.

How was India affected by British colonialism?

Colonialism was certainly a far more traumatising experience for colonial subjects than their colonisers. They suffered poverty, malnutrition, disease, cultural upheaval, economic exploitation, political disadvantage, and systematic programmes aimed at creating a sense of social and racial inferiority.

How did Britain impact India?

The British were able to take control of India mainly because India was not united. The British signed treaties and made military and trading alliances with many of the independent states that made up India. These local princes were effective at maintaining British rule and gained much from being loyal to the British.

What good did British do to India?

Social reforms. Perhaps the biggest contribution of British in India was removal of social practices like Sati, child marriage, untouchability. Not only they banned such cruel inhumane practices, they also promoted a widow’s remarriage. Just imagine what India would be if such practices still existed.

How many Indians did the British kill?

29 million Indians

What would happen if British never ruled India?

If the British had not conquered India they would have fought harder in United States and taken back their colonies during the War of 1812. Huge German emigration to the US would not have happened as the interiors would still be in Native American control.

What would happen if British still ruled India?

If the Britishers were still ruling Indians, there would have surely been much better infrastructure, but it was possible that most of the Indians would have either died in the wars of other countries or would have continued to be slaves to the Britishers living in India.

Could the British have kept India?

No. After WW2, British empire was not financially capable of ruling its colonies such as India. As per the below article in BBC, The catastrophic British defeats in Europe and Asia between 1940 and 1942 destroyed its financial and economic independence, the real foundation of the imperial system.

Is India still under Queen?

The monarchy was abolished on 26 January 1950, when India adopted a new constitution and became a republic within the Commonwealth, the first Commonwealth country to do so.

Was British colonialism good or bad for India?

But many historians generally consider the British presence in India, while at times horrifically violent, to be one of the most benevolent and productive in colonial history. …

Begin typing your search term above and press enter to search. Press ESC to cancel.

Back To Top