Why is the court case of Baker v Carr important?
Carr, (1962), U.S. Supreme Court case that forced the Tennessee legislature to reapportion itself on the basis of population. Traditionally, particularly in the South, the populations of rural areas had been overrepresented in legislatures in proportion to those of urban and suburban areas.
Why did Baker v Carr happen?
Case Summary Baker argued that because of population changes in the state, specifically migration to cities, his vote in an urban area had much less weight than that of a voter in a rural district, thus constituting a “debasement of [his] votes.”
What was the main issue in Baker v Carr?
Baker v. Carr involved a claim that the Tennessee legislature had failed to reapportion the state’s legislative districts in accordance with the state constitution.
What was the dissenting opinion in Baker v Carr?
Justice Harlan’s dissent asserted that the plaintiffs had failed to state a valid constitutional claim for which relief could be granted because the Equal Protection Clause did not require that all votes for a state legislature be weighed equally.
What was the majority opinion of Baker v Carr?
Justice Brennan wrote the majority opinion of the court, essentially stating that dilution of votes was, in fact, denying the residents of Tennessee equal protection of the Fourteenth Amendment. Justice Douglas wrote a concurring opinion, stating that voters should have a full constitutional value of their vote.
Which of the following best describes the holding in Baker v Carr 1961?
Terms in this set (10) Which of the following best describes the holding in Baker v. Carr (1961)? Unequal representation of citizens in legislative districts is unconstitutional and may be reviewed by the courts.
What was the Supreme Court’s ruling in the case Baker v Carr quizlet?
Terms in this set (2) Decision: The Warren Court reached a 6-2 verdict in favor of Baker. A lack of political question, previous court intervention in apportionment affairs and equal protection under the 14th amendment gave the court enough reason to rule on legislative apportionment.
What is the significance of Baker v Carr quizlet?
Unit 2 Readings (Baker v Carr) What is the significance of Baker v Carr.? The Court held that that redistricting qualifies as a justiciable question, thus enabling federal courts to hear redistricting cases.